The Game Meats Company of Australia v Farm Transparency International Ltd 2024 FCA 1455

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The Game Meats Company of Australia v Farm Transparency International Ltd [2024] FCA 1455
File number:
VID 417 of 2024
Judgment of:
SNADEN J
Date of judgment:
19 December 2024

Catchwords:
TORT – trespass – injurious falsehood – applicant seeks permanent injunctive relief to restrain respondent from publishing video images obtained as a result of trespasses – where applicant operates a commercial abattoir – where respondent is an animal rights organisation – where relevant video images portray scenes from within abattoir – where respondent made initial publication of relevant video images – where interim injunction granted to prevent publication – where trespasses are admitted – whether initial publication amounted to injurious falsehood – whether initial publication conveyed false representations as to applicant’s business – whether initial publication actuated by malice – whether applicant suffered special damage by alleged injurious falsehood – whether applicant entitled to permanent injunctive relief – whether damages an adequate remedy – whether applicant entitled to award of general damages – whether applicant entitled to award of exemplary damages – application allowed in part.

CONSUMER LAW – whether initial publication was misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive – whether relief under Australian Consumer Law available to applicant – application refused.

EQUITY – whether respondent’s ownership under Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) of copyright in imagery obtained during trespass is held on trust for applicant – whether existence of trust should be recognised – whether assignment of legal interests should be required – application refused.

TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 – Federal Court of Australia 2024
00:00:02 – Reasons for Judgement – PART 1: OVERVIEW
00:04:37 – PART 2: THE PROCEEDING – 2.1 The pleadings
00:08:44 – 2.2 The trial
00:12:48 – 2.3 Suppression
00:13:31 – PART 3: FACTUAL BACKGROUND – 3.1 The parties
00:16:33 – 3.2 The Eurobin Premises
00:20:04 – 3.3 The trespasses
00:24:09 – 3.4 The footage
00:26:06 – 3.5 The complaint to the Department
00:28:55 – 3.6 Media response
00:33:23 – MEDIA RELEASE: 17 MAY 2024
00:36:46 – Contact for interviews:
00:43:08 – 3.7 GMC’s response to the DAFF Complaint
00:53:01 – 3.8 The aftermath
00:54:22 – PART 4: GMC’S CAUSES OF ACTION
00:55:30 – PART 5: TRESPASS
00:58:35 – PART 6: INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD
01:00:58 – 6.1 Falsity
01:14:32 – 6.2 Malice
01:27:54 – 6.3 Damage
01:31:20 – 6.4 What about injunctive relief? – 6.5 Conclusions
01:34:35 – PART 7: THE AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW
01:38:04 – PART 8: BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT
01:41:57 – 8.1 Statutory provisions
01:44:35 – 8.2 Case law
01:54:29 – 8.3 What is the equity?
02:04:03 – 8.4 Discretionary considerations – 8.5 Conclusions
02:07:56 – PART 9: RELIEF IN TORT
02:08:38 – 9.1 Injunctive relief
02:27:03 – 9.2 The constitutional defence
02:31:19 – 9.3 General damages
02:38:24 – 9.4 Exemplary damages – 9.4.1 Criteria to be considered
02:43:51 – 9.4.2 Appropriateness of exemplary damages
02:46:25 – 9 Wilful destruction, damage etc. of property
02:51:21 – 9.4.3 What is an appropriate award?
02:58:50 – PART 10: DISPOSITION

#animalcrueltyfree #animalrights #abattoir #meat #trespass #australianlaw

COPYRIGHT: –
Copyright
The Commonwealth of Australia (the Commonwealth) owns the copyright under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) in all information and material produced by the Federal Court of Australia (the Court) except for judgments and information and other material created by the Judges of the Court. The Commonwealth also owns the copyright of all information and material produced by the Australian Competition Tribunal, the Copyright Tribunal of Australia and the Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal (The Tribunals).

The Federal Court of Australia – Copyright https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/copyright

“Judgments and Decisions

– Non-commercial use
You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation.

– “Commercial use
Judgments and decisions or excerpts from them can be reproduced or published in unaltered form, provided it is acknowledged that it is a judgment or decision of the Court or Tribunal [THE COURT OR TRIBUNAL]. Any commentary, head notes or additional information added is clearly attributed to the publisher/organisation and not the Court or Tribunals.

– The source from which the judgment was copied (eg. AustLII, etc.) should be acknowledged.” : – The Federal Court of Australia website:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1455

1 Comment

  1. The technology is available now to video record and audit the killing of all captive animals. As someone who killed animals for a living in a country slaughter yard for a local butcher shop, I respectfully ask that you closely read and/or listen to this Federal Court case. Especially if you buy and eat meat, and make up your own mind whether the judge was right in describing the actions of Farm Transparency International Ltd members as “beyond the pale” and “radical”.