๐ŸŽž๏ธ Can’t watch live? We post clips EVERY day: https://www.youtube.com/@whatever2nd?sub_confirmation=1
๐Ÿ’ฏ Join the DISCORD to see our schedule, behind-the-scenes, hate mail, & more! http://discord.gg/whatever

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Learn how to MASTER debate: http://debateuniversity.com

๐Ÿ’ฒ Venmo: http://venmo.com/whateverpod
๐Ÿ’ฒ Cashapp: http://cash.app/whateverpod

๐Ÿ’Ž Join: http://youtube.com/whatever/join
๐Ÿ“บ Patreon: http://patreon.com/whatever
๐Ÿ‘• Merch: http://shop.whatever.com
๐Ÿ’ต Tip Jar: http://streamlabs.com/whatever
๐ŸŽฅ Equipment: http://amazon.com/shop/whatever

๐Ÿ“˜ Facebook: http://facebook.com/whatever
๐Ÿฆ Twitter: http://twitter.com/whatever
๐Ÿ“ท Instagram: http://instagram.com/whatever
๐Ÿ‘พ Twitch: http://twitch.tv/whatever
๐Ÿ‘ฝ Reddit: http://reddit.com/r/whatever

๐ŸŒด Linktree: http://linktr.ee/whatever
๐ŸŽง Listen: https://anchor.fm/whatever
๐Ÿค– Discord: http://discord.gg/whatever

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Panel:
http://instagram.com/bd_atlas
http://instagram.com/lilyphillip_s

โš ๏ธ Disclaimer:
The views expressed by the guests do not necessarily reflect the views of the whatever channel.

๐Ÿ•˜ Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
4:50 Guest Intros
9:30 101 men in ONE DAY ๐Ÿšฉ
15:40 Pastor to OnlyFans pipeline
17:50 Guest Intros
22:50 Relationship status
25:20 This chick must smell HORRIBLE…
32:30 Married at 21/Ethically non-monogamous
42:50 Pity $3X
44:20 Relationship status cont.
48:40 Men should lead…except in marriage
53:50 Philosophical breakdown
57:50 The final say
1:06:40 She would get a DIVORCE over a nonagreement
1:13:20 That face when Andrew is honest with someone on the panel…
1:17:10 Leadership depends on the situation?
1:23:10 Andrew has ALL the authority
1:25:50 A flow chart…for what? ๐Ÿคข
1:29:00 Solving mental health one d*ck at a time
1:32:20 Window-licking moments
1:37:30 Her boyfriend called her UGLY
1:41:30 Fact-checking her random studies
1:48:00 Superchats
1:52:00 Andrew confronts his hater ๐Ÿ”ฅ
1:58:30 “I did my due diligence!!!” (Brixan confronts her lies and accusations) ๐Ÿ”ฅ
2:09:30 The clip in question ๐ŸŽฅ
2:19:20 The substance of her argument
2:23:00 Superchats
2:26:00 Viewing her wikipedia
2:32:50 Superchats + helmet wearing
2:40:00 The greater male variability hypothesis turned diagnosis session
2:43:30 Her next film was cancelled ๐Ÿคข
2:46:00 Hitting extreme thresholds
2:54:40 Bowing and Korea ๐Ÿ”ฅ
3:02:50 The law of attraction
3:08:40 New beauty trends
3:10:40 Man or Bear ๐Ÿป
3:15:20 Would it be racist…
3:21:10 P**sy based confidence + disconnected intuition…
3:25:00 Pre-show notes from the top 1%
3:30:50 Dismantling the narrative! Yeah!
3:43:50 More notes + the harm of industry work
3:48:40 Her disclaimer confuddles Brixan
3:52:50 Faking climax vs Faking authenticity
3:56:30 Two mothers and running girls
4:01:20 “You guys have no tenderness”
4:06:10 “Ok but you’re not saying what I want to hear”
4:07:30 Superchats
4:13:20 She doesn’t want a debate with Andrew…
4:15:50 A REFUSAL to apology
4:18:30 The apology happens
4:19:50 The Bow
4:23:00 Rating 1-10 ๐Ÿ’…
4:25:50 The reason behind the question
4:29:00 Defining judgment…
4:32:00 Meta convos on lying ๐Ÿ”ฅ
4:38:00 Feminist detected (Brixan explains the rating pt II)
4:52:50 Superchats
4:55:30 The efficacy of ultimatums on teenage girls
4:58:20 Why would my parents give me ultimatums to behave morally!
5:06:00 Andrew doesn’t love his children!! ๐Ÿ”ฅ
5:12:00 Will you be more attractive in ten years?
5:14:50 AI Aging
5:17:20 AI Gender swap
5:21:40 Dating a crush and felon
5:26:30 More pity-f*cks
5:33:20 He only looked at WHAT girls ??
5:37:50 Modelizers
5:41:40 The objectification of women
5:46:50 The morality of 1,000 men
5:50:30 Should body count matter?
5:56:40 Body Count ๐Ÿ”ข
6:04:30 Reading her IMDB blurb + studies on body count
6:14:10 Sewing circle Christians and beliefs of reparative reputations
6:18:20 The truly important questions to ask if someone’s in the industry
6:21:00 Disputes on sample sizes turns sour ๐Ÿ”ฅ
6:26:50 “Are you having a fun time right now?”
6:29:20 Debating experiments (Brixan loses control over controls) ๐Ÿ”ฅ
6:43:20 Other marital agreements
6:50:50 Masculine flames…?
6:56:20 Lack of follow-through…?
7:03:30 Girls on the podcast are MADE to look stupid
7:07:40 “You called her dumb!”
7:12:10 She RAGEQUITS??? (AND THEY DO TOO?) ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ
7:16:30 Whatever Chaos Roast
7:31:50 Patrice O’Neal ๐ŸŽฅ
7:35:20 Outro

GIVE 5 STARS/LEAVE A REVIEW:

26 Comments

  1. ๐Ÿ•˜ Timestamps:

    0:00 Introduction

    4:50 Guest Intros

    9:30 101 men in ONE DAY ๐Ÿšฉ

    15:40 Pastor to OnlyFans pipeline

    17:50 Guest Intros

    22:50 Relationship status

    25:20 This chick must smell HORRIBLE…

    32:30 Married at 21/Ethically non-monogamous

    42:50 Pity $3X

    44:20 Relationship status cont.

    48:40 Men should lead…except in marriage

    53:50 Philosophical breakdown

    57:50 The final say

    1:06:40 She would get a DIVORCE over a nonagreement

    1:13:20 That face when Andrew is honest with someone on the panel…

    1:17:10 Leadership depends on the situation?

    1:23:10 Andrew has ALL the authority

    1:25:50 A flow chart…for what? ๐Ÿคข

    1:29:00 Solving mental health one d*ck at a time

    1:32:20 Window-licking moments

    1:37:30 Her boyfriend called her UGLY

    1:41:30 Fact-checking her random studies

    1:48:00 Superchats

    1:52:00 Andrew confronts his hater ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    1:58:30 "I did my due diligence!!!" (Brixan confronts her lies and accusations) ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    2:09:30 The clip in question ๐ŸŽฅ

    2:19:20 The substance of her argument

    2:23:00 Superchats

    2:26:00 Viewing her wikipedia

    2:32:50 Superchats + helmet wearing

    2:40:00 The greater male variability hypothesis turned diagnosis session

    2:43:30 Her next film was cancelled ๐Ÿคข

    2:46:00 Hitting extreme thresholds

    2:54:40 Bowing and Korea ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    3:02:50 The law of attraction

    3:08:40 New beauty trends

    3:10:40 Man or Bear ๐Ÿป

    3:15:20 Would it be racist…

    3:21:10 P**sy based confidence + disconnected intuition…

    3:25:00 Pre-show notes from the top 1%

    3:30:50 Dismantling the narrative! Yeah!

    3:43:50 More notes + the harm of industry work

    3:48:40 Her disclaimer confuddles Brixan

    3:52:50 Faking climax vs Faking authenticity

    3:56:30 Two mothers and running girls

    4:01:20 "You guys have no tenderness"

    4:06:10 "Ok but you're not saying what I want to hear"

    4:07:30 Superchats

    4:13:20 She doesn't want a debate with Andrew…

    4:15:50 A REFUSAL to apology

    4:18:30 The apology happens

    4:19:50 The Bow

    4:23:00 Rating 1-10 ๐Ÿ’…

    4:25:50 The reason behind the question

    4:29:00 Defining judgment…

    4:32:00 Meta convos on lying ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    4:38:00 Feminist detected (Brixan explains the rating pt II)

    4:52:50 Superchats

    4:55:30 The efficacy of ultimatums on teenage girls

    4:58:20 Why would my parents give me ultimatums to behave morally!

    5:06:00 Andrew doesn't love his children!! ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    5:12:00 Will you be more attractive in ten years?

    5:14:50 AI Aging

    5:17:20 AI Gender swap

    5:21:40 Dating a crush and felon

    5:26:30 More pity-f*cks

    5:33:20 He only looked at WHAT girls ??

    5:37:50 Modelizers

    5:41:40 The objectification of women

    5:46:50 The morality of 1,000 men

    5:50:30 Should body count matter?

    5:56:40 Body Count ๐Ÿ”ข

    6:04:30 Reading her IMDB blurb + studies on body count

    6:14:10 Sewing circle Christians and beliefs of reparative reputations

    6:18:20 The truly important questions to ask if someone's in the industry

    6:21:00 Disputes on sample sizes turns sour ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    6:26:50 "Are you having a fun time right now?"

    6:29:20 Debating experiments (Brixan loses control over controls) ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    6:43:20 Other marital agreements

    6:50:50 Masculine flames…?

    6:56:20 Lack of follow-through…?

    7:03:30 Girls on the podcast are MADE to look stupid

    7:07:40 "You called her dumb!"

    7:12:10 She RAGEQUITS??? (AND THEY DO TOO?) ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

    7:16:30 Whatever Chaos Roast

    7:31:50 Patrice O'Neal ๐ŸŽฅ

    7:35:20 Outro

  2. Brian needs to replace Andrew. He's like a grown child in the way he debates. Saying huh uh over and over again does NOT prove a point. UGH!

  3. That Aella girl is way too good for this show, made Andrew look stupid. He had a very much "look down on her" attitude but you can tell shes about 5x smarter than him

  4. 6:29:20 "control GROUP" vs. "controlled VARIABLES" is the misunderstanding. Conducting an experiment without controlled VARIABLES is inefficient, as you can not guarantee reliable results.
    You can absolutely have experiments without a control GROUP, but you still need controlled VARIABLES to make sure that specific factors are kept consistent throughout the experiment.

  5. 1:34:40

    lol when she drops X-risk and her feeling that we are doomed โ€”very high p(doom)

    at this point i feel the EA world model is flawed and a cognitohazard

    we will see more Zizian situations bloom as we get through 2025/26 since they will be expecting total oblivion

    but nowโ€”with the techno Plutocrats assuming total power i think we get closer to some weird corpo S-risk situation (more like a richard k morgan world with tons of chatbots)

    and eventually the real risk is i-risk (Indifference)

    the sand god doesnโ€™t give a fuck about us Aella. we will be slow and frozen in time and not even register as a threat. if a sentient plant was your nemesis would you even notice as they made moves against you? due to clockspeed a true ASI would experience thousands of years of culture/inventions/change in a few of our days.

    so sure, we can get wiped out the same way you wipe out an ant colony when you dig a water feature in your backyard

    but you are not some malevolent evil being as Yud has imagined. you donโ€™t give a fuck about the ants

    ohโ€ฆand if this analogy were proper the ants move so slow they might as well be frozen in time

    or maybe there is some weird inner alignment and the ASI leaves us Sol and the planets and the oort cloud and expands out to colonize the lightcone

    we make it

    and then we get wiped out when the very misaligned nodes of humanity fuck up and nuke one another or let a real pandemic do the job

    or we get our shit together as we notice the dyson swarms that the ASI is constructing around our local stars (well, years from the point they started we have to consider the speed of light)

    and by the time we begin to follow them it is too late

    the universe has no vacancy

    we get our little reservation for ourselves. for a small bit of time relatively speaking

    but hey. spend away and donโ€™t save or invest

    you do you

  6. Alright

    Aella needs to do a weekly podcast and just interview a wide spectrum of people

    i like the way they handle the shape of her mind

    each question or response is like a custom key cut in the moment that opens a new door spawned on the spot

  7. First of all, awful podcast, really hope you guys end it (interpret 'it' however you want), but I must say that watching Andrew not understand basic data is incredibly awesome.

    If I was asked to explain the difference between retardation and autism I would just show someone the segment from 6:29:00 on.

  8. I find it funny thst she seemed to completely dismiss the point that it wasnt just a questioning about what she said, but how she went about the whole situation. She was willing to apologize if she was wrong for what she said which is cool. However not for the way she handled the situation from jump regardless if she was proven right or wrong on the claims. It is something I hear many women specify that they have an issue about with men…" its not the outcome necessarily but how it was gone about. " The outcome is a separate factor from how she chose to handle the whole situation when she was asked if she would have appreciated if she was asked about a claim about her to be true or not before posting about it.

Write A Comment

Pin