One night while drinking, the plaintiff claims the defendant broke his television and assaulted him with a bag of fried chicken, so he’s suing. However, the defendant insists he never damaged the plaintiff’s television. The defendant admits he assaulted his friend with a bag of chicken but says the plaintiff instigated the fight. The defendant is countersuing for defamation of character and the cost of food.

33 Comments

  1. Wowww…with all that yelling, even if he deserves a new TV he ought to get a contempt of court chargr😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫.

  2. I got to admit that I am a little bit confused with the judges’ deliberation. The chicken thrower is. In someone else house. How does he have have an expectation of privacy? What does matter if it makes him look bad. Just as the judge declared he is the one acting like a. Fool.

  3. This was funny af🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  4. I am crying real tears, y’all. More people need to see this😭😭

  5. 16:41 “assaultination” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  6. I looked at the caption on my recommendation page and said “I know you’re lying” 🤣🤣

Write A Comment